With the failure of this move request, it does not make sense for Erik Rhodes to redirect here, because in that case the article might as well be at Erik Rhodes.I would have argued for the article to be moved, and for a link to be put at the top of the article for the porn star because the actor appears to be far more notable, but I don't think it is enough reason to override the lack of consensus.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
However for the present, I have followed the solution that I have seen used before where there are many links for the most known name which is to redirect to that name and with pointers to the disambiguation page at the top of both pages.
This may end up the final solution, but we'll see what admin input we get.
What we really need here is the input of other neutral persons on the principal not the persons in question.
Doc , 3 July 2006 (UTC) I think we both agree that the porn star is part of a niche market, so I guess the issue is whether or not the actor is as well.